home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c-part2 / 12884 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1.3 KB
  1. Path: roverpte.demon.co.uk!news
  2. From: Paul Edwards <paule@roverpte.demon.co.uk>
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
  4. Subject: Re: Anyone out there using Gimpel's PCLint 7?
  5. Date: 3 Apr 1996 10:15:32 GMT
  6. Organization: Advanced Technology Centre, University of Warwick
  7. Message-ID: <4jtj44$ltp@boiled.rover.com>
  8. References: <4jo458$bqs@thumper.cis.varian.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.147.104.126
  10. X-NNTP-Posting-Host: roverpte.demon.co.uk
  11. Mime-Version: 1.0
  12. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  13. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  14. X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; I; 16bit)
  15.  
  16. Michael.Diack@ukos.varian.com wrote:
  17. >If so - is it as good as the marketing bumph suggests? I use 6.00f, and
  18. >am very pleased with it, but version 7 sounds like another big leap forward.
  19.  
  20. We've got a copy of 6.00 with the intention of using it to support us in 
  21. enforcing a 'safer subset' of C. So I can't answer the question, but I'd 
  22. certainly be interested in any people's experiences of using PC Lint for 
  23. this sort of application.
  24.  
  25. In particular, what sort of programming problems in C are not picked up 
  26. by PC Lint?
  27.  
  28. -------------------------------------------------------------
  29. Paul Edwards
  30. Rover Group Advanced Technology Centre, University of Warwick
  31. paule@roverpte.demon.co.uk  OR  p.d.edwards@warwick.ac.uk
  32. -------------------------------------------------------------
  33.  
  34.  
  35.