home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: roverpte.demon.co.uk!news
- From: Paul Edwards <paule@roverpte.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Anyone out there using Gimpel's PCLint 7?
- Date: 3 Apr 1996 10:15:32 GMT
- Organization: Advanced Technology Centre, University of Warwick
- Message-ID: <4jtj44$ltp@boiled.rover.com>
- References: <4jo458$bqs@thumper.cis.varian.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.147.104.126
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: roverpte.demon.co.uk
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (Windows; I; 16bit)
-
- Michael.Diack@ukos.varian.com wrote:
- >If so - is it as good as the marketing bumph suggests? I use 6.00f, and
- >am very pleased with it, but version 7 sounds like another big leap forward.
-
- We've got a copy of 6.00 with the intention of using it to support us in
- enforcing a 'safer subset' of C. So I can't answer the question, but I'd
- certainly be interested in any people's experiences of using PC Lint for
- this sort of application.
-
- In particular, what sort of programming problems in C are not picked up
- by PC Lint?
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------
- Paul Edwards
- Rover Group Advanced Technology Centre, University of Warwick
- paule@roverpte.demon.co.uk OR p.d.edwards@warwick.ac.uk
- -------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-